1. Traditional (Monolithic) CMS
A tightly coupled architecture where the backend (content creation and storage) and frontend (presentation layer) are bound together.
Pros:
- Simple to set up and manage with low technical barrier
- Ideal for small to medium websites with straightforward requirements
- Less technical complexity for content teams with built-in WYSIWYG editors
- All-in-one solution with integrated themes and templates
- Lower initial implementation cost
Cons:
- Limited flexibility and scalability for growing businesses
- Difficult to reuse content across multiple platforms (e.g., mobile apps)
- Slower performance with increasing content volume
- More complex upgrades that might affect both content and presentation
- Restricted technology choices for frontend development

